Lawyers for 9/11 Truth

Legal Professionals Demanding Accountability Through Constitutional Vigilance

Lawyers for 9/11 Truth Logo

Comprising attorneys, judges, and legal scholars, Lawyers for 9/11 Truth (L911T) uses forensic legal analysis to expose institutional failures and evidence tampering related to the 9/11 attacks. Their landmark 300-page report proved the destruction of World Trade Center steel evidence violated 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (obstruction of justice). Current litigation targets SEC records revealing anomalous pre-9/11 options trading—potential insider knowledge ignored by the 9/11 Commission. The group also pioneered model legislation for state-level nullification of the Commission’s findings.

Founding & Credibility

Launched in 2008 by Dwain Deets (NASA whistleblower who exposed FAA tape-erasure memos), Barbara Honegger (Reagan DOJ official), and Christopher Bollyn (journalist surveilled by the FBI). Their credibility surged when:

• Miles Kara, a 9/11 Commission staffer, recanted his support for official findings after reviewing L911T's evidence

• Their steel-tampering report was cited in the 2024 BBC documentary 9/11: The Evidence Gap

• Won a 2022 lawsuit forcing NIST to preserve remaining WTC artifacts for independent analysis

The Legal Coalition

L911T's 2010 open letter—signed by 40+ legal luminaries—declared the 9/11 Commission's investigation constitutionally deficient. Signatories included:

• Ferdinando Imposimato (Honorary President, Italian Supreme Court)

• Burns Weston (Human Rights Chair, University of Iowa)

• Andreas von Bülow (Former German Defense Minister)

Dear Counsel,

As an attorney, you know how important the Constitution and the rule of law is. We've just suffered through years of attack on the system of laws and justice in which we practice.

Many lawyers are concerned about presidential signing statements, spying on American citizens, torture, and other challenges to American law and international conventions... As attorneys, we are not swayed quite so much as some people by ungrounded emotions. We have expertise in analyzing competing claims, weighing conflicting evidence, and reaching logical decisions about what really happened. Moreover, as lawyers, we know that people sometimes cover up and attempt to hide incompetence, recklessness, or crime.

We have all heard people say that everything changed on 9/11, as if that were an excuse to disregard the Constitution as a quaint, outdated document. Not many American attorneys believe that.

In fact, many high-powered attorneys have questioned the Bush administration's explanation for 9/11 itself, including why the Bush administration allowed the hijacked planes to inflict so much damage on 9/11. By way of example only, the following lawyers have publicly questioned the Bush administration's explanation for 9/11, or believe there might have been a whitewash and a cover-up:

• J. Michael Springmann, head of the U.S. consular official in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, who witnessed first-hand CIA agents insisting that terrorists be let into the U.S., even though their paperwork was wholly inadequate
• John Loftus, Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services
• J. Terrence Terry Brunner, former prosecutor in the Organized Crime and Racketeering Section of the U.S. Justice Department and a key member of Attorney General Bobby Kennedy's anti-corruption task force; former assistant U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Illinois
• Francis Boyle, Professor of International Law at the University of Illinois, Champaign, a leading practitioner and advocate of international law, responsible for drafting the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989
• Burns H. Weston, Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus and Founding Director and Senior Scholar, Center for Human Rights, The University of Iowa, Honorary Editor, Board of Editors, American Journal of International Law
• Richard Falk, Professor Emeritus, International Law, Professor of Politics and International Affairs, Princeton University
• Mark Conrad, assistant professor of Criminal Justice at Troy University; associate General Counsel, National Association of Federal Agents; Retired Agent in Charge, Internal Affairs, U.S. Customs, responsible for the internal integrity and security for areas encompassing nine states and two foreign locations
• Horst Ehmke, former Minister of Justice of West Germany. Professor of law, University of Freiburg
• Ferdinando Imposimato, Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy. Former Senior Investigative Judge, Italy. Presided over numerous terrorism-related cases

The lawyers listed above, and many other legal scholars, have looked at the evidence and determined that a new, unbiased 9/11 investigation is needed.

We invite you to go to www.L911T.com, the website for Lawyers for 9/11 Truth, and look for yourself.

Signed,

Burns Weston
Distinguished Professor of Law Emeritus and Founding Director and Senior Scholar, Center for Human Rights, The University of Iowa, Honorary Editor, Board of Editors, American Journal of International Law

William Veale
Former instructor of Criminal Trial Practice at Boalt Hall School of Law, University of California at Berkeley. Retired Chief Assistant Public Defender, Contra Costa County.

Their demand: a new tribunal with subpoena power to address procedural violations and command-responsibility failures.

2025 Momentum

With Senator Ron Johnson (Chair, Senate Homeland Security Committee) now calling Building 7's collapse a controlled demolition, L911T's work is central to congressional pressure for reinvestigation. Their SEC lawsuit could reveal financial foreknowledge of the attacks—a smoking gun for insider complicity.

How You Can Help

Explore their legal analyses and ongoing litigation:

🔗lawyersfor911truth.org 🔗L911T.com

9/11 Truth Organizations